<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Vichar...  (Thought...)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atulsays.com/blog</link>
	<description>Free stream of feelings...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:19:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Why spread hate, if u can&#8217;t bring peace? by new now</title>
		<link>http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=94&#038;cpage=1#comment-3501</link>
		<dc:creator>new now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=94#comment-3501</guid>
		<description>http://twitter.com/gaurav_2004/status/9238449685</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://twitter.com/gaurav_2004/status/9238449685" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/gaurav_2004/status/9238449685</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why spread hate, if u can&#8217;t bring peace? by Archis Gore</title>
		<link>http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=94&#038;cpage=1#comment-3500</link>
		<dc:creator>Archis Gore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 02:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=94#comment-3500</guid>
		<description>I so completely agree. Sometimes I can&#039;t help but simply question the intellectual capacity of journalists - they may just go to prove that all the smart people go to engineering and then these were the left-overs who took to other professions.

This is a textbook case of stereotyping and branding - something anyone who is reasonably educated should be aware of.

Hate the terrorist. Hunt him down and proscecute him under the full extend of India Law. Heck, if that means hunting down some of our own who terrorize the streets of Mumbai and Pune, then so be it. The law must be fair and impartial.

Do it, and I promise, Pakistani people will have reason to hate the terrorist who for no reason involves them in wars that they never wanted to sign up for.

Indians have a notion of self-importance that every pakistani, instead of worrying about making a living and feeding his family, starves to death waiting to wage war on us. Give up this stupid inferiority complex people - not everyone cares about you a whole lot.

What we need to guard against is that they just may start caring. If we brand everyone, then we involve them in a war they don&#039;t like, and when that happens, a person turns desperate.

A terrorist is someone who spreads terror amongst people - I can name at least one Maharashtrian who had spread terror for months throughout Mumbai. Journalists - ready to blame &quot;Maharashtrian people&quot; for it? Let&#039;s see your guts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I so completely agree. Sometimes I can&#8217;t help but simply question the intellectual capacity of journalists &#8211; they may just go to prove that all the smart people go to engineering and then these were the left-overs who took to other professions.</p>
<p>This is a textbook case of stereotyping and branding &#8211; something anyone who is reasonably educated should be aware of.</p>
<p>Hate the terrorist. Hunt him down and proscecute him under the full extend of India Law. Heck, if that means hunting down some of our own who terrorize the streets of Mumbai and Pune, then so be it. The law must be fair and impartial.</p>
<p>Do it, and I promise, Pakistani people will have reason to hate the terrorist who for no reason involves them in wars that they never wanted to sign up for.</p>
<p>Indians have a notion of self-importance that every pakistani, instead of worrying about making a living and feeding his family, starves to death waiting to wage war on us. Give up this stupid inferiority complex people &#8211; not everyone cares about you a whole lot.</p>
<p>What we need to guard against is that they just may start caring. If we brand everyone, then we involve them in a war they don&#8217;t like, and when that happens, a person turns desperate.</p>
<p>A terrorist is someone who spreads terror amongst people &#8211; I can name at least one Maharashtrian who had spread terror for months throughout Mumbai. Journalists &#8211; ready to blame &#8220;Maharashtrian people&#8221; for it? Let&#8217;s see your guts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why spread hate, if u can&#8217;t bring peace? by Amit Sharma</title>
		<link>http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=94&#038;cpage=1#comment-3499</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=94#comment-3499</guid>
		<description>True! Couldn&#039;t have agreed more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True! Couldn&#8217;t have agreed more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Purpose of human race &#8211; my theory&#8230; by siddharth</title>
		<link>http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=88&#038;cpage=1#comment-3476</link>
		<dc:creator>siddharth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=88#comment-3476</guid>
		<description>nice article.
I agree with the point that the leaders/groups set down a set of rules according to the situations that they faced in their respective times. What we don&#039;t understand is that the set of rules were written at a particular time by a set of mortals who obviously cannot see the future. Hence it is stupid to just follow rules set by our ancestors which might not be applicable to situations that exist today. I believe all the problems that exist today is a result of following these rules blindly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice article.<br />
I agree with the point that the leaders/groups set down a set of rules according to the situations that they faced in their respective times. What we don&#8217;t understand is that the set of rules were written at a particular time by a set of mortals who obviously cannot see the future. Hence it is stupid to just follow rules set by our ancestors which might not be applicable to situations that exist today. I believe all the problems that exist today is a result of following these rules blindly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Purpose of human race &#8211; my theory&#8230; by GS</title>
		<link>http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=88&#038;cpage=1#comment-3475</link>
		<dc:creator>GS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=88#comment-3475</guid>
		<description>interesting read!

my belief about &quot;purpose of human race&quot;.. there&#039;s none.. coz if we look at the SOCIAL ANIMALs without the undue emphasis on the SOCIAL part of it, we are at the end of the day ANIMALS!! Thus competition or group-ism, is but natural.

As far as the cannibalistic nature of the competition we&#039;re discussing, it takes me to the point where i disagree with you archis,  &quot;When the challenges offered by nature became too measly....&quot;, i believe whatever we invented are challenges by nature itself; unless we are considering the HUMAN RACE to be so far superior than NATURE, to say MAN MADE is not natural, because our spoken language means it differently and because we are separate from nature. Frankly, WE are (part of) NATURE too.

This brings me to the point where i agree with you Atul, we do need a set of rules to survive without (an apparent) chaos.. but then, don&#039;t two perfectly discplined herds of lions, foxes, dogs etc. fight in the jungle?.. why do we separate our &quot;RELIGIOUS&quot; fanatics from those herds?.. because we understand the underlying, probably unnecessary, logic behind religion and do not the same way understand what underlies the herds&#039; motive(s)?

Again i agree with you Archis that some humans are animals and share the animal instincts of instantaneously satisfying hunger above and below the waist.. and rules or whatever that comes out of our order making.. has sufficient advantage-taking opportunity for satisfying these hungers.. and (as humans can think longer term, it&#039;s supposed to) keep doing so for a long time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting read!</p>
<p>my belief about &#8220;purpose of human race&#8221;.. there&#8217;s none.. coz if we look at the SOCIAL ANIMALs without the undue emphasis on the SOCIAL part of it, we are at the end of the day ANIMALS!! Thus competition or group-ism, is but natural.</p>
<p>As far as the cannibalistic nature of the competition we&#8217;re discussing, it takes me to the point where i disagree with you archis,  &#8220;When the challenges offered by nature became too measly&#8230;.&#8221;, i believe whatever we invented are challenges by nature itself; unless we are considering the HUMAN RACE to be so far superior than NATURE, to say MAN MADE is not natural, because our spoken language means it differently and because we are separate from nature. Frankly, WE are (part of) NATURE too.</p>
<p>This brings me to the point where i agree with you Atul, we do need a set of rules to survive without (an apparent) chaos.. but then, don&#8217;t two perfectly discplined herds of lions, foxes, dogs etc. fight in the jungle?.. why do we separate our &#8220;RELIGIOUS&#8221; fanatics from those herds?.. because we understand the underlying, probably unnecessary, logic behind religion and do not the same way understand what underlies the herds&#8217; motive(s)?</p>
<p>Again i agree with you Archis that some humans are animals and share the animal instincts of instantaneously satisfying hunger above and below the waist.. and rules or whatever that comes out of our order making.. has sufficient advantage-taking opportunity for satisfying these hungers.. and (as humans can think longer term, it&#8217;s supposed to) keep doing so for a long time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Purpose of human race &#8211; my theory&#8230; by Archis Gore</title>
		<link>http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=88&#038;cpage=1#comment-3474</link>
		<dc:creator>Archis Gore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=88#comment-3474</guid>
		<description>Interesting thoughts. We also did discuss the other aspect of having rules - to keep people in check. But then I&#039;m covering that series beginning with my comments on Middle Class morality.

The other side of rules is also to curb competition. By imposing crap like morality on the majority, the few in minority who have no morality can take advantage.

How many times have we been backstabbed by people who made us feel guilty for failing? It happens more often than we might think. In competition, the rules of the game are not followed by all parties and the ones that do are meant to do so in order to put them at a disadvantage.

But yeah, generally your thoughts are correct. A large part of rules and laws did come out of a raw desire to find a better mating partner and nothing more. When the challenges offered by nature became too measly, we invented castes, religion, and a whole lot of artificial labels and titles to help us compete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts. We also did discuss the other aspect of having rules &#8211; to keep people in check. But then I&#8217;m covering that series beginning with my comments on Middle Class morality.</p>
<p>The other side of rules is also to curb competition. By imposing crap like morality on the majority, the few in minority who have no morality can take advantage.</p>
<p>How many times have we been backstabbed by people who made us feel guilty for failing? It happens more often than we might think. In competition, the rules of the game are not followed by all parties and the ones that do are meant to do so in order to put them at a disadvantage.</p>
<p>But yeah, generally your thoughts are correct. A large part of rules and laws did come out of a raw desire to find a better mating partner and nothing more. When the challenges offered by nature became too measly, we invented castes, religion, and a whole lot of artificial labels and titles to help us compete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which city is on THE RADAR today? by On Terrorists and Freedom Fighters &#171; Archis&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=59&#038;cpage=1#comment-3473</link>
		<dc:creator>On Terrorists and Freedom Fighters &#171; Archis&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=59#comment-3473</guid>
		<description>[...] fighters, Gandhianism, indian cities, non-violence, terrorism &#8212; archisgore @ 3:26 am   A friend of mine recently blogged about the latest bombings taking place in prominent Indian cities. He and I had a rather [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fighters, Gandhianism, indian cities, non-violence, terrorism &#8212; archisgore @ 3:26 am   A friend of mine recently blogged about the latest bombings taking place in prominent Indian cities. He and I had a rather [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Composing a mail or simply put, chatting in Devnagari. Can it be a reality sometime? by Atul</title>
		<link>http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-3472</link>
		<dc:creator>Atul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=70#comment-3472</guid>
		<description>Mantra,

The purpose here is to do transliterate and not translate. Translate can be really painful simply painful coz it adds context to it. Transliterate on the other hand is phonetic conversion from one script to other. We need to map the phonemes of the languages to each other that is important.

Atul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mantra,</p>
<p>The purpose here is to do transliterate and not translate. Translate can be really painful simply painful coz it adds context to it. Transliterate on the other hand is phonetic conversion from one script to other. We need to map the phonemes of the languages to each other that is important.</p>
<p>Atul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Composing a mail or simply put, chatting in Devnagari. Can it be a reality sometime? by mantra</title>
		<link>http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=70&#038;cpage=1#comment-3470</link>
		<dc:creator>mantra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=70#comment-3470</guid>
		<description>This kind of interface will be useful for your parents
http://www.cfilt.iitb.ac.in/~corpus/marathi/

If you want to translate the content written by them in your preferred language over a IM then you may be interested in rosy.
(caution: marathi is not supported in google translation)

You also mentioned a call (and then you want to finish this as a weekend project ) if you want to translate voice then there is a way for that. See Bonn synthetic system.

I will happy take part in your efforts of finishing this project if its still in progress.

Thanks
-shivaji</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of interface will be useful for your parents<br />
<a href="http://www.cfilt.iitb.ac.in/~corpus/marathi/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cfilt.iitb.ac.in/~corpus/marathi/</a></p>
<p>If you want to translate the content written by them in your preferred language over a IM then you may be interested in rosy.<br />
(caution: marathi is not supported in google translation)</p>
<p>You also mentioned a call (and then you want to finish this as a weekend project ) if you want to translate voice then there is a way for that. See Bonn synthetic system.</p>
<p>I will happy take part in your efforts of finishing this project if its still in progress.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
-shivaji</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Outsourcing &#8211; my theory&#8230; by Outsourcing - my theory&#8230; &#171; News : India-Developers.com</title>
		<link>http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=85&#038;cpage=1#comment-3466</link>
		<dc:creator>Outsourcing - my theory&#8230; &#171; News : India-Developers.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 07:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atulsays.com/blog/?p=85#comment-3466</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post:  Outsourcing - my theory&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post:  Outsourcing &#8211; my theory&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
